In the latest news and analysis…
Itching for action
Le Nouvel Observateur reports that France may not wait for the UN’s green light to launch a military intervention in the Central African Republic:
“ ‘We are preparing to intervene in the Central African Republic, probably just after France hosts the African security summit scheduled for December 6 and 7, but before if necessary,’ a French official said.
…
Since September, in addition to the 420 soldiers already on the ground to protect Bangui’s airport, the French army has discretely pre-positioned troops in various countries in the region in preparation for a CAR intervention.
…
The legal basis for the planned operation has not yet been established.” [Translated from the French.]
Detention quotas
National Public Radio reports that US law requires that at least 34,000 immigrants be held in detention centres at all times:
“The detention bed mandate, which began in 2009, is just part of the massive increase in enforcement-only immigration policies over the last two decades. The last time Congress passed a broad immigration law dealing with something other than enforcement — such as overhauling visa or guest worker policies — was 1986.
…
‘They’re trying to pick people up for either very minor traffic violations or other minor convictions that wouldn’t be considered serious, but that they can quantify as a criminal alien,’ says Nina Rabin, an immigration law professor at the University of Arizona.”
Privatizing nature
The Scotsman reports on the debate over “natural capital accounting” that is playing out on the sidelines of a UN-backed conference in Edinburgh:
“As the two-day inaugural World Forum on Natural Capital gets under way in Edinburgh, economic justice groups have condemned its aim to put a price tag on resources such as water, air, geology and all life on earth so companies can include these ‘stocks’ in their balance sheets.
Organisers of the United Nations-backed conference claim the planet is more likely to be protected if its assets are given a financial value, but activists fighting global poverty believe this will lead to speculators buying and selling environmental assets for profit.
It amounts to ‘privatising nature’, according to representatives of European protest groups who are today hosting a counter event called the Forum on Natural Commons.”
Beyond aid
The Center for Global Development has released its annual Commitment to Development Index, which “goes beyond measures of foreign aid” to assess trade, migration, environment, etc. policies in 27 of the world’s richest countries:
“Finland does best on finance because of very good financial transparency and support to investment in developing countries. Switzerland comes last, mainly because it lacks financial transparency and does not have a national agency to offer political risk insurance. Norway takes first place on migration, accepting the most migrants for its size and bearing a large share of refugee burden, unlike the last-ranked Slovakia, which is relatively closed to migrants from developing countries.
…
Canada is not party to the Kyoto Protocol and has high fossil-fuel production, high greenhouse gas emissions, and low gas taxes, putting it at the bottom.
…
Last-ranked Sweden is proportionally the largest arms exporter to developing countries and does not help protect sea lanes.
…
In short, all countries could do much more to spread prosperity.”
Inconvenient laws
The Canadian Press reports that a Canadian company is demanding “expeditious” changes to Romanian mining laws so it can go ahead with what would be Europe’s largest open-pit gold mine:
“The chief executive officer of Gabriel Resources Ltd. says it needs quick progress on a new mining law in Romania or the company will be forced to do ‘something radically different’ with its controversial gold project.
A draft bill that specifically would have allowed the Rosia Montana project, one of Europe’s biggest gold mining projects, to go ahead was rejected by a Romanian parliamentary commission last week.
…
Gabriel Resources CEO Jonathan Henry said Tuesday that the company’s shareholders are running out of patience.
…
He did not say what ‘radically different’ would mean, but said the company was looking at all of its options.”
Right to privacy
Foreign Policy reports that the US is leading the charge against German and Brazilian efforts to have online privacy recognized as an international human right:
“The United States and its allies, according to diplomats, outside observers, and documents, contend that the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights does not apply to foreign espionage.
In recent days, the United States circulated to its allies a confidential paper highlighting American objectives in the negotiations, ‘Right to Privacy in the Digital Age — U.S. Redlines.’ It calls for changing the Brazilian and German text so ‘that references to privacy rights are referring explicitly to States’ obligations under ICCPR and remove suggestion that such obligations apply extraterritorially.’ In other words: America wants to make sure it preserves the right to spy overseas.
…
There is no extraterritorial obligation on states ‘to comply with human rights,’ explained one diplomat who supports the U.S. position. ‘The obligation is on states to uphold the human rights of citizens within their territory and areas of their jurisdictions.’ ”
Generic fears
Intellectual Property Watch reports on rich-country concerns that India’s approach to intellectual property rights could spread to other places:
“Over the past 12 to 18 months, there have been several developments in India related to patents that have stirred foreign industry and government criticism, but have been applauded by public health advocates. These include high-profile court decisions such as Novartis, in which the Supreme Court ruled that cancer drug Glivec cannot be patented in India because it does not represent a true innovation. The outcome was seen as having a potential impact beyond India’s borders.
India also issued a compulsory licence on a [cancer] medicine that caused significant concern among the patent-holding industry.”
Sweet 16
The Associated Press reports that Illinois has become the 16th US state to legalize same-sex marriage:
“ ‘We understand in our state that part of our unfinished business is to help other states in the United States of America achieve marriage equality,’ [Illinois Governor Pat Quinn] said before he signed the bill on a desk once used by President Abraham Lincoln. He said part of that mission was to ensure that ‘love is not relegated to a second class status to any citizen in our country.’ ”
The Center for Global Development counts “forcible humanitarian interventions, although it counts only operations approved by an international body such as the UN Security Council or NATO” as contributing to security!! That means that the UK, US and France etc are actually given points for actions such as the bombing of Libya. The false premise of this index is that we are all pulling together to help the benighted poor (and some of us need to do better by dropping tariffs or whatever) but it is ridiculous in this day and age to ignore the role that overt and covert interventions ranging from destabilisations to sanctions to bombing campaigns play in the continued underdevelopment of the global South. Any real index will show the main imperialist states as having a massive negative impact on development.
Great point, Kieran. The Central African Republic seems to be the next country in line for a “humanitarian” intervention by its former colonizer. Incredibly, France’s foreign minister seems to be using CAR’s doctor shortage & high infant mortality as part of the justification for military operations.
http://www.liberation.fr/monde/2013/11/21/la-centrafrique-est-au-bord-du-genocide_960995
Another weird thing about the Commitment to Development Index is the high ranking accorded to countries such as Luxembourg, the Netherlands & the UK that are notorious for facilitating the corporate tax avoidance that robs poor countries of billions.
What we need is an underdevelopment index based on destruction, intervention, destabilisation, neocolonialism, support of corruption, enforced neoliberalism and the actual flows of wealth from the underdeveloped states to the developed states.
Thank you for the information about CAR. I see Samantha Power has reared her “humanitarian” head. She has laid a lot of groundwork to convince people that exactly this sort of alleged “pre-genocide” situation is license for Western intervention. It is a very dangerous notion because if you can have people believing that you have prevented “genocide” (which in the minds of most people is some sort of hate-filled orgy of ethnic killing) then you can actually commit neocolonial genocide without attracting the criticism that you would by repeating the lies behind previous interventions.